Skip to content
Friday, October 9, 2026
Portal Portal Wave

Could Different States Follow Australia's in Prohibiting Online Networks for Teenagers Under 16?

The Australian decisive action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Movement

Across Europe, a rising group of nations are considering similar measures.

  • Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation is expected to be passed in the coming year.
  • Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "influence of the algorithms".
  • The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "an measures in reserve".
  • In The Spanish government, the president has called on the legislature to pass a bill increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
  • In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a related action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
  • The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory motion demanding a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it highlights of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," commented a leading parliamentarian behind the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the government has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "based on strong data".

Last year, momentum grew behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government pledged to further research the matter.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. One foundation founded by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to harmful social media material contends that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and fit for young users," said a leading child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, action is primarily happening at the regional government level due to national stalemate.

  • Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
  • The state of Florida has signed a bill barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
  • Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional access requiring a guardian's okay.
  • Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills mandating guardian approval for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to copy Australia's path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Beyond these regions, further nations are similarly taking action.

  • The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
  • The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more nuanced stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this international discussion evolves, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that governments globally are increasingly content to wait for the industry to self-regulate.

By

Kim Martin

Lena Visser is a Dutch designer and writer passionate about visual storytelling and digital innovation.

Portal Portal Wave

Type to search articles.